I was shocked when I first heard about the “judge judy fake hermes bag police” story. What kind of police force is this? I mean, does a fake designer bag really warrant an arrest? In my opinion, it felt like they were enforcing the law simply for show and making a mockery of the justice system.
Wow, it was just so absurd! As someone who’d just seen a clip of it online, I couldn’t believe my eyes. Was this really happening in a world where laws protect us? It felt like a slap in the face, and yet their authority seemed so insistent. I mean, really, could a person really be made to appear in court for a fake bag?
To me, it seemed like a major overreach on the part of authority – a step too far in the direction of judgment. It felt like judge judy had flipped the script, taking the side of the police instead of the citizen. At the end of the day, no one was winning: the shop board hadn’t paid homage, and the police had somewhere wasted their time and energy.
As I heard more of the story, it was clear that they were only using the law to send a message. It felt like a way of bullying people into following what they believed should be the accepted standard, and I’m not sure that’s fair. It made me ponder further about the power the police holds, and how much they truly have to gain with such an inappropriate use of their authority.
It felt like a game – and suddenly the rules of the game weren’t quite so clear. I mean, fake bags if they can just swing a fine or arrest at someone for a fake Hermes then why not any other thing? Would they be doing the same thing in cases of knife crime or drug possession? It felt like a form of selective justice, rather than a deterrent.
I’ve always believed that justice should be blind, leaving no room for prejudice or bias. But this didn’t feel like equal justice for all. It felt like small-minded policing almost, and to be honest, I felt more than a bit uncomfortable. In my view, it made the whole “judge judy fake hermes bag police” incident look like nothing more than a waste of time – and it certainly didn’t send the message it was intended to.
They’re calling it “overpolicing”, and in a way, it almost insults the dedication and hard work of law enforcement. After all, if the police are willing to take it this far, then what else would they do if someone was in real trouble? And would they really be justified in what they do? The whole thing made me think of the role that media plays in our justice system; it just felt like judge judy had taken it too far this time.
The whole case just felt like judge judy was using the law to bully her way into the fashion industry. Was this really necessary? I mean, replica bags surely a mere fine would have been more than enough to prove a point? Of course, I squirmed a bit at the thought of what would happen if all the judge judy’s of the world could just order an arrest on any case they chose.
It made me realize just how important judges, lawyers, and law enforcement officers are – and how important it is to use their power with wisdom and discretion. It also made me uncomfortable about the celebrity status judge judy seemed to be enjoying from this case – it felt almost as if someone was not only benefiting from it personally, but manipulating the justice system to their own gain.
